Lance Armstrong is one of the biggest motivational stories
of all time. The man beat testicular cancer and won seven tour de Frances in a
row. These accomplishments were once viewed as impossible. For almost two
decades Lance Armstrong has fought the attacks that he used performance
enhancing drugs. Tonight during an interview with Oprah Winfrey, the publicized
hero came clean that he cheating during almost his whole career using
performing enhancing drugs, including testosterone boosters and blood doping. From public relations perspective Lance did
exactly what he needs to do try to restore his image, and be given any
creditability at all. He finally came clean! He was very forthcoming and did
not hold back from any questions offered by Winfrey.
The best option for
Lance is to continue to tell the truth, give all the details, and try to use
his story to affect the world. Lance will face the attacks and criticism, in
fact it will probably be that way for a while. However could Lance potentially
use his story to change the meaner of sports? Over the last two decades we have
found compelling evidence that superstar athletes from baseball, football, and
other popular sports have used human growth hormones or steroids. Can he use
his story, his energy, and his leadership to create a clean or cheat free
professional sports environment.Lance does not have the option that many
companies in the past have done with changing their name or merging with another
company. He is Lance Armstrong, there is no changing that he is who he is.
There is hope that one day Lance Armstrong’s name may not leave a sour taste in
the public’s mouth.
What does Lance Armstrong do with his Livestrong foundation
he started years ago to help cancer patients and survivors. In such disasters, corporations
will usually make adjustments at the top to bring in new faces and show that
change has taken place. But what happens when the face of your company and the
CEO is the person that needs to be removed?
One important step for Livestrong will be to show that they
can move forward without Lance Armstrong.
They must use an emotional plead to help others understand that the
Livestrong foundation is committed to helping cancer victims survive. They must
help the public understand that there is something much bigger than Lance
Armstrong, there are people dying every day from a devastating disease. In
order for the Livestrong foundation to successfully adapt to the new perceptive
they must understand the latitude of acceptance.The new faces of livestrong
will need to find areas where investors and donors can be persuaded. Indeed
they will need to use strong, logical, and personally relevant arguments.
Livestrong will need to have the public’s trust and in time they can have the
hopes of having a positive view in the public’s perceptive.
No comments:
Post a Comment