Many companies today are
asking to be “friends” with their employees via Facebook, Twitter, and other
social media sites. There has been some controversy with this approach; some
feel it is an invasion to personal privacy. Employers want to be sure that their
employees are not destroying the face of their company with written words or
statements. Certainly both perspectives have some valid points, however from a
Public Relations standpoint it is viewed by most as a smart decision. Some
businesses are now even asking interview candidates for permission to be able to
view their Facebook page during interviews. Recently the University of Michigan
has been in the middle of the media when athletic director Dave Brandon said
that the athletic department had a fake online persona befriend players. He
defended their actions saying it was with the goal to teach the student-athletes
a lesson on the dangers of online relationships for athletes. Since the recent
statement people have been commenting on Michigan’s actions; many feel Michigan
is “catfishing” their athletes. Catfishing is when someone pretends on social
media to be someone they are not. They have received great criticism for their
approach.
If I were the President of
the school or in a high ranking position I too would request that my players be
followed on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites. As a company,
school, or organization those that represent you create an image to the public
of who you are. This school has done nothing wrong. Representatives involved in
the situation have said “We’re real. [Catfishing is] someone faking an identity.
When we Facebook them, they see me; they see pictures of my wife and kids. The
men and women who work for us (some of whom are interns) use their own real
profiles to do the social media research. As long as the company isn't deceiving
their trainees or sharing the information they learn publicly (or using it to
humiliate their trainees during a social media training class), the term
‘catfishing’ seems totally misplaced,”
Michigan has done a great job
of responding to the controversy by first identifying what catfishing is. They
have succeeded in communicating their objectives to the public. They have made
it clear why they are doing what they are doing. They simply hope that their
athletes become aware of the problems that exist. One idea that may really help
the University would be having some student-athletes comment regarding the
situation to help the public realize that there are no hard feelings between the
school and the players.
No comments:
Post a Comment